<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Archbishops’ Council ignored chances to fix safeguarding risk assessment loophole	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://churchabuse.uk/2024/08/15/archbishops-council-ignored-chances-to-fix-safeguarding-risk-assessment-loophole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/08/15/archbishops-council-ignored-chances-to-fix-safeguarding-risk-assessment-loophole/</link>
	<description>Highlight continuing safeguarding failures by the Church of England and its Archbishops’ Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:55:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Even after Parliament called it out, Synod members are still being misled about secret hearings - Church Abuse		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/08/15/archbishops-council-ignored-chances-to-fix-safeguarding-risk-assessment-loophole/#comment-3783</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Even after Parliament called it out, Synod members are still being misled about secret hearings - Church Abuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=251#comment-3783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] August 2024 – “Archbishops’ Council ignored chances to fix safeguarding risk assessment loophole”, showing how opacity was being preserved by [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] August 2024 – “Archbishops’ Council ignored chances to fix safeguarding risk assessment loophole”, showing how opacity was being preserved by [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The General Synod and Safeguarding – a look ahead to February’s Group of Sessions - Church Abuse		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/08/15/archbishops-council-ignored-chances-to-fix-safeguarding-risk-assessment-loophole/#comment-346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The General Synod and Safeguarding – a look ahead to February’s Group of Sessions - Church Abuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 22:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=251#comment-346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to others and continue to work to ensure that our systems are made ever stronger and more robust.”Such a statement is more meaningless “fine words with no action” when the regulations come to be amended with nothing to provide the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to others and continue to work to ensure that our systems are made ever stronger and more robust.”Such a statement is more meaningless “fine words with no action” when the regulations come to be amended with nothing to provide the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Angusian		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/08/15/archbishops-council-ignored-chances-to-fix-safeguarding-risk-assessment-loophole/#comment-149</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angusian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=251#comment-149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A useful and concise evaluation - a frank report on the church&#039;s incompetence (at the most generous interpretation), on Synod&#039;s bewilderment and inadequate critical response, and on the hierarchy&#039;s timeserving, and patronizing unwillingness to accept responsibility for failure.
I write as acommitted Anglican layman despairing at archiepiscopal lack of theological awareness!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A useful and concise evaluation &#8211; a frank report on the church&#8217;s incompetence (at the most generous interpretation), on Synod&#8217;s bewilderment and inadequate critical response, and on the hierarchy&#8217;s timeserving, and patronizing unwillingness to accept responsibility for failure.<br />
I write as acommitted Anglican layman despairing at archiepiscopal lack of theological awareness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blackburn Cathedral Safeguarding continued &#124; Thinking Anglicans		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/08/15/archbishops-council-ignored-chances-to-fix-safeguarding-risk-assessment-loophole/#comment-148</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackburn Cathedral Safeguarding continued &#124; Thinking Anglicans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=251#comment-148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Gavin Drake has written Archbishops&#8217; Council ignored chances to fix safeguarding risk assessment loophole [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gavin Drake has written Archbishops&#8217; Council ignored chances to fix safeguarding risk assessment loophole [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
