<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: An open letter to the State Office Holders who are Church Commissioners	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://churchabuse.uk/2024/11/29/an-open-letter-to-the-state-office-holders-who-are-church-commissioners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/11/29/an-open-letter-to-the-state-office-holders-who-are-church-commissioners/</link>
	<description>Highlight continuing safeguarding failures by the Church of England and its Archbishops’ Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2025 00:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: james		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/11/29/an-open-letter-to-the-state-office-holders-who-are-church-commissioners/#comment-311</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2025 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=287#comment-311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fascinating! But also utterly ghastly! Police, teachers, NHS workers etc...will probably have the option of union advice on complaints, and the possibility of baseline legal support. But to have immediate (and paid upfront?) legal representation (fees undisclosed senior advice) just sounds plain barmy. If this is how the Church system works, then it explains lots of anomalies and problems. Bishops will surely be disincentivised from informally offering apologies, or accepting responsibility for errors and negligence. Whatever their guilt or innocence, there may be every incentive to hold out, and go into formal hearings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating! But also utterly ghastly! Police, teachers, NHS workers etc&#8230;will probably have the option of union advice on complaints, and the possibility of baseline legal support. But to have immediate (and paid upfront?) legal representation (fees undisclosed senior advice) just sounds plain barmy. If this is how the Church system works, then it explains lots of anomalies and problems. Bishops will surely be disincentivised from informally offering apologies, or accepting responsibility for errors and negligence. Whatever their guilt or innocence, there may be every incentive to hold out, and go into formal hearings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elaine Richardson		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/11/29/an-open-letter-to-the-state-office-holders-who-are-church-commissioners/#comment-241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elaine Richardson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 16:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=287#comment-241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Safeguarding needs to be outsourced to a completely Independent professional body.  The bishop of Newcastle&#039;s letter demonstrates that the archbishops and bishops are 1) blatant in using their power,  and 2) protecting each other, whilst disregarding review recommendations.
I would like to read the Rushton Review. Is it not in the public domain?
This just needs to stop.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safeguarding needs to be outsourced to a completely Independent professional body.  The bishop of Newcastle&#8217;s letter demonstrates that the archbishops and bishops are 1) blatant in using their power,  and 2) protecting each other, whilst disregarding review recommendations.<br />
I would like to read the Rushton Review. Is it not in the public domain?<br />
This just needs to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Religion news 2 December 2024 - Religion Media Centre		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/11/29/an-open-letter-to-the-state-office-holders-who-are-church-commissioners/#comment-239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Religion news 2 December 2024 - Religion Media Centre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=287#comment-239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Drake, former Church of England synod member and campaigner on safeguarding issues, has written an open letter to six top politicians who are automatically church commissioners, urging them to investigate the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Drake, former Church of England synod member and campaigner on safeguarding issues, has written an open letter to six top politicians who are automatically church commissioners, urging them to investigate the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Opinion – 30 November 2024 &#124; Thinking Anglicans		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2024/11/29/an-open-letter-to-the-state-office-holders-who-are-church-commissioners/#comment-237</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Opinion – 30 November 2024 &#124; Thinking Anglicans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=287#comment-237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Gavin Drake Church Abuse An open letter to the State Office Holders who are Church Commissioners [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gavin Drake Church Abuse An open letter to the State Office Holders who are Church Commissioners [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
