<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why are clergy discipline tribunals still exempt from the Freedom of Information Act?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://churchabuse.uk/2026/01/12/why-are-clergy-discipline-tribunals-still-exempt-from-the-freedom-of-information-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/01/12/why-are-clergy-discipline-tribunals-still-exempt-from-the-freedom-of-information-act/</link>
	<description>Highlight continuing safeguarding failures by the Church of England and its Archbishops’ Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: editor		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/01/12/why-are-clergy-discipline-tribunals-still-exempt-from-the-freedom-of-information-act/#comment-3530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=412#comment-3530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://churchabuse.uk/2026/01/12/why-are-clergy-discipline-tribunals-still-exempt-from-the-freedom-of-information-act/#comment-3527&quot;&gt;Rowland Wateridge&lt;/a&gt;.

The difference between C of E tribunals and any disciplinary system established by the Methodist or Roman Catholic Churches, is that Clergy Discipline Tribunals exercise the judicial power of the state - they are legally established by statute law - &quot;Measures&quot;, which have have been approved by Parliament and received royal assent, and having the same status as an Act of Parliament.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://churchabuse.uk/2026/01/12/why-are-clergy-discipline-tribunals-still-exempt-from-the-freedom-of-information-act/#comment-3527">Rowland Wateridge</a>.</p>
<p>The difference between C of E tribunals and any disciplinary system established by the Methodist or Roman Catholic Churches, is that Clergy Discipline Tribunals exercise the judicial power of the state &#8211; they are legally established by statute law &#8211; &#8220;Measures&#8221;, which have have been approved by Parliament and received royal assent, and having the same status as an Act of Parliament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rowland Wateridge		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/01/12/why-are-clergy-discipline-tribunals-still-exempt-from-the-freedom-of-information-act/#comment-3527</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rowland Wateridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=412#comment-3527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to defined &#039;public authorities&#039;.  The Church of England  is not a &#039;public authority&#039;.  As two other similar examples, the Methodist Church in Great Britain and Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales are in exactly the same position.  They are not excluded from the Act: they are not included, an important distinction.  In all three cases there may be an entitlement to freedom of information in an ancillary public authority role, e.g. management of a school.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to defined &#8216;public authorities&#8217;.  The Church of England  is not a &#8216;public authority&#8217;.  As two other similar examples, the Methodist Church in Great Britain and Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales are in exactly the same position.  They are not excluded from the Act: they are not included, an important distinction.  In all three cases there may be an entitlement to freedom of information in an ancillary public authority role, e.g. management of a school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Opinion – 14 January 2025 &#124; Thinking Anglicans		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/01/12/why-are-clergy-discipline-tribunals-still-exempt-from-the-freedom-of-information-act/#comment-3523</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Opinion – 14 January 2025 &#124; Thinking Anglicans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=412#comment-3523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Gavin Drake Church Abuse Why are clergy discipline tribunals still exempt from the Freedom of Information Act? [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gavin Drake Church Abuse Why are clergy discipline tribunals still exempt from the Freedom of Information Act? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
