<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Church Abuse	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://churchabuse.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://churchabuse.uk/</link>
	<description>Highlight continuing safeguarding failures by the Church of England and its Archbishops’ Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 12:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Safeguarding “direction of travel” is not a destination by Opinion – 4 March 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/03/03/safeguarding-direction-of-travel-is-not-a-destination/#comment-4079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Opinion – 4 March 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=547#comment-4079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Gavin Drake Church Abuse Safeguarding &#8220;direction of travel&#8221; is not a destination [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gavin Drake Church Abuse Safeguarding &#8220;direction of travel&#8221; is not a destination [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Safeguarding “direction of travel” is not a destination by jameshardy		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/03/03/safeguarding-direction-of-travel-is-not-a-destination/#comment-4075</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jameshardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 08:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=547#comment-4075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Medicine had its Shipman moment. UK death reporting and GMC practice had to change. We saw pretty rapid results. 

With Anglicanism, across the UK and Ireland, we see the opposite. 

PRIEST SHEPHERD FRIEND is the ending on a notorious clerical abuser&#039;s tombstone by the Archbishop of Armagh&#039;s Cathedral seat.

Does the Irish equivalent of the Archbishop of Canterbury have absolutely no sense of shame?

A senior cleric contacted me last year, and alleged how the Archbishop celebrated the abuser in a press statement!

This was before newspapers-BBC-courts exposed a hidden scandal with the late &#039;Reverend Canon Dr William George Neely&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medicine had its Shipman moment. UK death reporting and GMC practice had to change. We saw pretty rapid results. </p>
<p>With Anglicanism, across the UK and Ireland, we see the opposite. </p>
<p>PRIEST SHEPHERD FRIEND is the ending on a notorious clerical abuser&#8217;s tombstone by the Archbishop of Armagh&#8217;s Cathedral seat.</p>
<p>Does the Irish equivalent of the Archbishop of Canterbury have absolutely no sense of shame?</p>
<p>A senior cleric contacted me last year, and alleged how the Archbishop celebrated the abuser in a press statement!</p>
<p>This was before newspapers-BBC-courts exposed a hidden scandal with the late &#8216;Reverend Canon Dr William George Neely&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why does the Church of England describe child abuse as an “intimate sexual relationship”? by Jane Chevous		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/02/17/why-does-the-church-of-england-describe-child-abuse-as-an-intimate-sexual-relationship/#comment-3922</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jane Chevous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 07:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=531#comment-3922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you Gavin for highlighting this inaccurate language and the consequences of it so clearly. I experienced a similar situation in my case, where despite my using the phrase &#039;non-consensual sexual activity&#039; which is the statutory definition of rape, the caseworker was resistant to using the term &#039;rape&#039; to describe my abuse. They also kept asking me about consent when I had made it clear I had been overpowered, groomed and spiritually controlled. It&#039;s clear this was also true for Z. 

The Sexual Offences Act makes it clear that compliance due to coercive control, vulnerability, power differential and abuse of trust is NOT consent. It was not possible for Z to consent and CPS guidance to the Act is very clear about this.

As victims who had attachment to our abusers and were groomed and exploited, it can be hard for us not to feel responsible for what happened and to use the language of assault, when there may not have been violence. This is understandable given the insidious nature of grooming and coercive control, which can be psychological not just physical. The use of spiritual authority in this way is recognised in domestic abuse legislation as coercion.

Z may not be comfortable with such language herself but the tribute should have been aware of the 2003 Act &#038; CPS guidance and been clear in their own language. In plain English, this was rape.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Gavin for highlighting this inaccurate language and the consequences of it so clearly. I experienced a similar situation in my case, where despite my using the phrase &#8216;non-consensual sexual activity&#8217; which is the statutory definition of rape, the caseworker was resistant to using the term &#8216;rape&#8217; to describe my abuse. They also kept asking me about consent when I had made it clear I had been overpowered, groomed and spiritually controlled. It&#8217;s clear this was also true for Z. </p>
<p>The Sexual Offences Act makes it clear that compliance due to coercive control, vulnerability, power differential and abuse of trust is NOT consent. It was not possible for Z to consent and CPS guidance to the Act is very clear about this.</p>
<p>As victims who had attachment to our abusers and were groomed and exploited, it can be hard for us not to feel responsible for what happened and to use the language of assault, when there may not have been violence. This is understandable given the insidious nature of grooming and coercive control, which can be psychological not just physical. The use of spiritual authority in this way is recognised in domestic abuse legislation as coercion.</p>
<p>Z may not be comfortable with such language herself but the tribute should have been aware of the 2003 Act &amp; CPS guidance and been clear in their own language. In plain English, this was rape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why does the Church of England describe child abuse as an “intimate sexual relationship”? by jameshardy		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/02/17/why-does-the-church-of-england-describe-child-abuse-as-an-intimate-sexual-relationship/#comment-3901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jameshardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=531#comment-3901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;Intimate sexual relationship&#039; could infer penetrative sex on far more than one occasion. Perhaps the words used by legal people sometimes have subtle inferences, and deliberate care is taken in their choosing of terms?

Public and transparent processes do matter. A vicar&#039;s transfer from Ireland to Norwich Diocese helps illustrate this. &#039;Dialogue Ireland&#039; website has close to 20 posts on the case of Rev William James Stewart. 

It takes time and effort to read those reports, ideally in conjunction with a BBC report and an article by The Church of England newspaper. But that effort brings a reward. It&#039;s an interesting story with positive outcome. Transparency matters!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Intimate sexual relationship&#8217; could infer penetrative sex on far more than one occasion. Perhaps the words used by legal people sometimes have subtle inferences, and deliberate care is taken in their choosing of terms?</p>
<p>Public and transparent processes do matter. A vicar&#8217;s transfer from Ireland to Norwich Diocese helps illustrate this. &#8216;Dialogue Ireland&#8217; website has close to 20 posts on the case of Rev William James Stewart. </p>
<p>It takes time and effort to read those reports, ideally in conjunction with a BBC report and an article by The Church of England newspaper. But that effort brings a reward. It&#8217;s an interesting story with positive outcome. Transparency matters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why does the Church of England describe child abuse as an “intimate sexual relationship”? by Nigel LLoyd		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/02/17/why-does-the-church-of-england-describe-child-abuse-as-an-intimate-sexual-relationship/#comment-3891</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel LLoyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 12:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=531#comment-3891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well put, Gavin. The inability of some, in positions of authority in the church, to not see such issues is deeply troubling. Indeed we do have some way to go to sort out both safeguarding and the whole area of understanding human relationships, as well as what constitutes abuse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put, Gavin. The inability of some, in positions of authority in the church, to not see such issues is deeply troubling. Indeed we do have some way to go to sort out both safeguarding and the whole area of understanding human relationships, as well as what constitutes abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why does the Church of England describe child abuse as an “intimate sexual relationship”? by Opinion – 18 February 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/02/17/why-does-the-church-of-england-describe-child-abuse-as-an-intimate-sexual-relationship/#comment-3890</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Opinion – 18 February 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=531#comment-3890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Gavin Drake Church Abuse Why does the Church of England describe child abuse as an &#8220;intimate sexual relationship&#8221;&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gavin Drake Church Abuse Why does the Church of England describe child abuse as an &#8220;intimate sexual relationship&#8221;&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The real Clergy Conduct Measure is still behind the curtain by Why does the Church of England describe child abuse as an “intimate sexual relationship”? - Church Abuse		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/02/11/the-real-clergy-conduct-measure-is-still-behind-the-curtain/#comment-3862</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why does the Church of England describe child abuse as an “intimate sexual relationship”? - Church Abuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=522#comment-3862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;]  11 February 2026 &#124; The real Clergy Conduct Measure is still behind the curtain  [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  11 February 2026 | The real Clergy Conduct Measure is still behind the curtain  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The real Clergy Conduct Measure is still behind the curtain by General Synod – 9-13 February 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/02/11/the-real-clergy-conduct-measure-is-still-behind-the-curtain/#comment-3800</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[General Synod – 9-13 February 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=522#comment-3800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The real Clergy Conduct Measure is still behind the curtain [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The real Clergy Conduct Measure is still behind the curtain [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on When the regulator comes knocking, the Archbishops’ Council puts on the blinkers by General Synod – 9-13 February 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/02/08/when-the-regulator-comes-knocking-the-archbishops-council-puts-on-the-blinkers/#comment-3790</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[General Synod – 9-13 February 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=495#comment-3790</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] When the regulator comes knocking, the Archbishops&#8217; Council puts on the blinkers [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When the regulator comes knocking, the Archbishops&#8217; Council puts on the blinkers [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Preaching accountability while closing the shutters by General Synod – 9-13 February 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans		</title>
		<link>https://churchabuse.uk/2026/02/09/preaching-accountability-while-closing-the-shutters/#comment-3789</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[General Synod – 9-13 February 2026 &#124; Thinking Anglicans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://churchabuse.uk/?p=500#comment-3789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Preaching accountability while closing the shutters [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Preaching accountability while closing the shutters [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
